![]() ![]() Only issue to know the minimal conf to launch ptq correctly Some user says it is ok with I7. Maybe there would be a better market on iOS, it certainly has better driver support, but overall it's about a quarter of the mobile market (and market share at least not growing I think). Also Android customers are not used to things costing 100 bucks or more, and Pianoteq is competing with professional sample libraries that also cost 100s of dollars/euros, not with toy romplers on Android for 2 bucks. Essentially the developer has to put in additional work to enable buyers to not-buy their product. So some developers have opted to offer demo or test versions of their products just so consumers can check before buying. ![]() There are options for low-latency audio nowadays, but whether they work depends on your device, and you never know that before trying. But there's hardly any pro music stuff available, and that's because sound drivers continue to be a hot mess. ![]() For the most part I still like the platform better than iOS, although Google as a company is a lot shadier than Apple when it comes to data protection. Drivers continue to be a mess, and while getting a low-latency, stable setup ist very much possible, you should be prepared for having to tweak it for some time, which is more or less due to a problem Android also has: very high variation in device configurations.Īs to the last point, there's good reason at least to not support Andoid, and its high device variance is a big part of it. PTQ does run on Arm Linux, but personally my Linux days are over, especially when it comes to audio software. In fact a Windows 10 device wakes from power saving mode very quickly, almost as quickly as Android or iOS also Windows tablets do exist. Boot times of several minutes would be a different matter, but those are a thing of the past. It takes longer than that just to open and prepare my acoustic piano. So forgive me if I am confused as to why 10 seconds are a "problem". Launching an app on Android or iOS devices also takes a few seconds. ![]() I suppose it should be ARM architecture based (pianoteq seems compatble) and runs very probably linux solution: so maybe PinePhone or PineTab is my solution? If yes i m interested to know if someone runs pianoteq on it. So for me the ideal would be that pianoteq is available on small platform typically smartphone (tablet in fact because no need of 3G) with feature: relatively cheap, maybe enough powerfull CPU, no need to switch off, always on with the sotware always running, small device, limited power recharge device.Īs pianoteq does not exist on Android (or Iphone) what is the closer alternative for a device that support pianoteq with a maximum of the advantage of a tablet?Īn important requirement as well is that there no loss of sound quality from the reference platform (PC?) : so the idea is to know the minimum of CPU and RAM necessary for such a device. If dedicated only to pianoteq it is a costly solution (in particular if you want a SSDD hard drive in order the PC open clikly). Nevertheless run it on a PC has drawbacks: a laptop is not so large but take a significative place of an upright piano, it takes time to launch it (10 s approx is a mini), and run the software, it needs to be powered if it stay on the piano. I m insterested to buy a pianoteq licence since my test of the trial version: the sound is very good and realistic regarding the one of the electronic module of my acoustic upright piano (GENIO PREMIUM with midi usb front plug). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |